During
the course of my project work, it was my first time working with foreign
students whose grasps of English were weak. It was definitely challenging
because of the language barrier and we could not understand each other’s ideas
and wants clearly. Our styles of communication were also different. I am used
to being indirect and instead of directly challenging another person’s views or
making an outright request for something to be changed, I would pose it in form
of a question. Usually, one would realize what I was getting at and correct the
problem at hand. This ranged from basic things like getting on the same page of
things during a group discussion, to more tricky issues like trying to explain
to someone how his work was not up to standard. However, I soon realized that
the subtlety is lost if one’s language skills is weak, because they would only
get the superficial meaning of what I asked. Soon, I found it more effective to
pose direct requests and things speeded up from there, as we understood each
other much better.
Patience
is also key, especially when working with someone from a different cultural
background. Often much easier said than done, it is unfair to one if s/he is
disadvantaged because of his/her weak language skills. It is not one’s fault if
English is not one’s native tongue (and it’s such a culturally imperialistic
mindset to think otherwise). So as stronger speakers, we should always
empathize, be more encouraging and always give positive recognition for every small
effort or improvement. Doing so really went a long way in boosting my teammate’s
confidence. This also proved to be the critical point, as productivity really
spiked when I was more patient and I could see him putting in more effort to speak
English too. Indeed, constant encouragement is key in motivating someone to
speak regularly in a foreign tongue.
Besides
linguistic challenges, another huge obstacle was that our project was based on
a local problem. Naturally, as a foreigner who has been in Singapore for only
half a year, his would not have as much depth of the insight into things as
what locals have. In light of this, I initially allocated him more tasks that
were either simpler or at most design-related, as that was his forte. I had the
wrong mindset that this project is language-intensive and would be out of his
reach. However, this proved to be counter-intuitive because he felt that I did
not trust enough and thus, did not put in much effort too. However, this
changed 360 degrees when I delegated significant responsibilities to him, like
report writing and data analyses. It was after that that I could really see his
interest and drive to excel spike.
Therefore,
when managing people, while it is natural for us to feel insecure delegating
responsibilities to people, I leant how to rein in my insecurity and be more
trusting. This includes listening to someone else’s ideas more, even if they
were poorly expressed, and let someone take on greater responsibility right
from the start. This trust is critical in forming good working relationships
and this recognition and indirect affirmation of someone’s abilities is often
what kick starts in one the drive to perform and excel.
However,
whilst recognizing this, I also have to be realistic about the task’s demands
and deadlines. We were lucky to be given six weeks to work on a project and
this gave us ample time to figure out what we wanted, consultatively. It also
gave us allowance and space to experiment with some ideas, even if it might not
be the best ones. In the workplace, deadlines would be much tighter and if
one’s language or communication skills are weak, people would have no patience
for you nor would they trust you with responsibilities since you cannot even
prove yourself linguistically. Therefore, it is important that we communicate
well.
Thus,
knowing that our workplace would be globalized in the future, this experience
has definitely taught me how to empathize better and communicate in ways that
respects and not undermine, regardless of one’s cultural background.
Hi Min Hui, I can empathize with you on the point that you are used to being indirect instead of directly challenging the views of others. Like you, I rather take a 'softer' approach when i disagree with someone. But in recent times, i also felt that it is sometimes better to be direct rather than indirect. For instance, I believe that being direct with a person not only saves time but also attacks the problem at the root instead of beating around the bush. But i have a problem with that too. When i employ this approach, i find that people find me a little too aggressive which may cause unnecessary conflicts. To me this is a big challenge as I have yet to find the perfect balance. I don't want to always be 'beating around the bush' neither do I want to appear aggressive. At the end of the day, I guess I have to read the person whom I'm talking to carefully before choosing to be direct or indirect. Thanks for sharing Min Hui.
ReplyDeleteI read both Min Hui's post and Elisha's response with interest. How does one give criticism to another- be it a colleague or a subordinate withour being insulting on the one hand and totally evasive or cryptic, on the other. In workplace situations, this is a very important skill indeed. You need to be able to tell someone that the work they turned in needs fixing but without undermining their self-esteem. We will discuss this in the last lesson.
ReplyDeleteHey MIn Hui,
ReplyDeleteI understand what you went through. I had TWO foreigners in my group working on a local issue. It indeed was a challenge.
Unlike you and Elisha, I'm not someone who uses the 'softer' approach. I'm rather straightforward, and I think being direct has helped me a lot. In fact I pride myself in being straightforward, direct, and being able to say things others would not have otherwise said.
Of course, I never really gave much thought about whether I was being insulting. I don't expect people to be insulted, maybe because I'm not easily insulted, but people do get offended. Maybe I was just lucky but I've never been into any conflicts because of my 'straightforwardness'. I agree with Elisha that being direct saves alot of time, and nips the problem in the bud. While I treat people that way, I also like to be treated the same way. I like it when people are honest and direct to me, rather than lie to me in order to protect my feelings or whatever it is. I know the intention behind concealing the truth is a noble one, but it disturbs me rather than pacifies me. That's just how I view it.
Regarding the part on hurting people's feelings, if you read my most recent post, I'm working on how to better empathise!
Diana